Comparison
Clausebox vs Word for contracts.
Word is fine for one-off documents. For contracts you write again and again with small variations, Word's lack of a reusable clause library and its finicky numbering turn a 15-minute job into an hour. Here's how Clausebox compares.
| Feature | Word | Clausebox |
|---|---|---|
| Reusable clause library | ||
| Drag-to-reorder sections | ||
| Auto-renumber on reorder | ||
| One-click clause variant swap | ||
| Five numbering schemes | ||
| Rich-text editing | ||
| PDF export | ||
| Browser-only (no install) | ||
| Free tier |
When to stick with Word
If you write one-off documents that you'll never reuse, Word is fine. Clausebox earns its keep the second you find yourself copying last month's contract to start a new one.